From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 28966
Date: 2003-12-30
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr GasiorowskiON fem. <ro,gg> has gen.sing. <ro,ggvar>, so it should be
> <piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:
>> Gk. hrakos comes from older *wrakos, I think (and
>> certainly not from *krak)
> Pokorny concurs - k-extension of *wer 'tear', root #2168,
> and cites Aeolian <brakos>. Any chance of it being related
> to English _rag_, from Old Norse ro,gg 'tuft or strip of
> fur'. I don't know whether Norwegian and Swedish _ragg_
> 'rough hair' tell us anything about whether an initial /w/
> has been lost.