From: alex
Message: 28787
Date: 2003-12-27
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" wrote:the _required_ form in CR is not required since Aromanian "dipã" can be
>
>> m_iacomi wrote:
>>
>>> You certainly have a _big_ difficulty to understand what a crucial
>>> argument is and the peremptory proof of AR form and Italian word.
>>> That is your problem to cope with _before_ any tentative of
> answering
>>> to my message.
>>
>> Aromanian "i" does not explain Italian "o" and DacoRomanian "u" and
>> MeglRom. "u".
>
> OK, so you did not understood. Read again.
>
>> Your CR *depã is reconstructed just for explaing the Arom. form but
> not
>> for DacoRom. MeglRom, Italian.
>
> Wrong. CR "*depã(o)" is the normal exitus of Latin "de pos(t)" with
> the
> stress on /e/ and it is also a regular source for modern AR forms.
> Consequently, this CR form is _required_. Its purpose is not to
> explain