Re: [tied] Re: Alb. =?UNKNOWN?Q?af=EBr_=28P=2ES=2E=29?=

21-12-03 23:08, Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:

> Why do you insist on this unlikely outcome? The final /s/ of <mos> is
> generally regarded, with good reason, as reflecting enclitic *-kWe
> (*meh1-kWe 'and don't ...'). This reconstruction is far more convincing
> than the entirely ad hoc assumption of *-s (what would it have been or
> meant?).

Cf. Gk. me:te (*meh1-kWe) as in me:te ... me:te ... 'neither ... nor ...'

Piotr