From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 28451
Date: 2003-12-13
> 13-12-03 16:54, Abdullah Konushevci wrote:form
>
> > I guess that its origin can't be devided from PIE *ksun-, basic
> > *su(n)- (cf. Greek syn-, Slavic so-, s-.homophonous
>
> The origin of some Albanian prefixes will probably remain debatable
> forever, since they are too strongly reduced to preserve sufficient
> information about their earlier form. Some are certainly of Latin
> origin, e.g. ç- (~ sh- ~ zh-) < *ds^- < dis-. The partly
> prefix sh- (~ zh-) may also reflect Lat. ex-. This of coursedoesn't
> exclude the possibility that some instances of <sh-> reflect aprefix of
> native origin (perhaps even the same *h1eg^s- that appears inLatin).
> I'm not sure where z- (~ s-) comes from (I have no access toÇabej's
> classic study of Albanian prefixes; Cimochowski gives the earlierform
> as *dz- ~ *ds- but doesn't explain it further). At any rate, *(k)sun- is
> a most unlikely source -- the initial would not have developed intothing
> Albanian /s-/ or /z-/.
>
> PSl. *sU(n)- (*so~- in old compound nouns) is most likely the same
> (modulo apophony) as Skt. sa(m)-, Germanic *sam- and Gk. (h)a-,namely
> PIE *som- 'together, with'. There are some perfectly parallel formslike
> PSl. *so~logU (< *som-logHo-): Gk. alokHos (< *sm.-logHo-) 'bedmate,
> spouse' or PSl. *so~dU 'trial, judgement' < *som-dHh1-o- 'puttings- ~
> together, confrontation', as in Skt. sandHi-, sandHa-.
>
> In some Slavic languages, including Polish, the prepositions and
> preverbs *sU 'with' and *iz 'out (of)' have merged phonetically as
> z- ~ zV-, and the original contrast of meaning has consequentlybecome
> blurred. They have to all intents and purposes fallen together asone
> preposition/preverb with several different meanings.************
>
> Piotr