Re: [tied] Re: Soma -- It's not that difficult

From: Glen Gordon
Message: 28422
Date: 2003-12-13

David:
>I misunderstood and thought Alex was trying to lend something
>to Kalyanaraman's soma theory. It was the respective forms of
>lunacy of _those_ two I was referring to. I didn't realize you
>were the intended recipient of Alex's "zeam�", and sincerely
>wish to withdraw any criticism of his attempt to "fertilize"
>you with it. Though please keep in mind the fact which throws
>its reliability into question considering its source, which is
>Alex's nuts.

Hmmm, we probably shouldn't bust a nut impotently
implicating my or Alex' marbles into the topic of seminal
soma. I apologize for becoming "testy". I realize that I've
been testy so much in the past that one might refer to my
outbursts in the plural: "testies". I guess I feel so overfertilized
with problems lately that anything might make me shoot,
and shoot far, lemme tell you. Hehehe. Well, enough of
that now. I think I've fully ejaculated all that I needed to
oralize. Carry on.


= gLeN

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca