Re: [tied] Rom. tri

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 01:18:29 +0000, alexandru_mg3 <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:

> "I can practically confirm you are not aware what you're doing
>when speaking _as far as phonology is concerned_"
>
> I told you this, because I asked today 3 persons with
>phylological studies at Cluj-Napoca University and they told me that
>there is no DIHPTONG in the spelling of 'tri'

Well, this vindicates M. Iacomi's point. The _spelling_ of tri is utterly
irrelevant. What matters is the _pronunciation_.

Enough about this.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...