alexandru_mg3 wrote:
> C1. "We cannot take into account the Romanian language in order to
> decide the existance of the Dacian /H/. "
>
> And my initial assumption should be change in :
>
> "Dacian /H/ -> seems possible."
Günther Reichenkron sustained that PIE *sk or PIE *sp can have in Rom. a
double treatment as in Albanian. He meant, the PIE *sk could once yeld
/h/ and once /sk/.
I don't quite agree with him but this is my problem. Here some example
of him from substratual words where we have "h" initial "h".
For etym. I will use here the one of DEX and one of GR (Günther
Reichenkron); "n.e." means "no entry in DEX, the word is not known in
DEX"
habã = Nachtwache, Platz zum Sitzen (DEX= n.e.; GR= *skabh)
habã = Krankheit (DEX=n.e.; GR =*skabh)
hâlbe = Spülicht, Überbleibsel(DEX=n.e.; GR=*(s)kel)
a hãlpi="être versée"=(DEX=n.e.; GR=*skelpii)
hãrean = Molke(DEX=n.e.; GR=*skerna)
hârghie= etwas schlechtes (DEX=n.e.; GR=*skerdh)
hârSie = Lamfell(DEX=lie Hung. "hasker, haskartya"; GR=*skers-ia)
a horTi, hotTiS = gleiten lassen, quer, schräg(DEX= un.etym;
GR=*skorts+ii)
hâTã = Herde (DEX=n.e.; GR*spit-ia)
hâTa = kleiner Schlitten(DEX=n.e.; GR=*skit-ia)
a hârcãi, a horcãi= schnarchen(DEX= onomat.;GR=*sker-)
a hâTâna= schauckeln(DEX= from onomat. "hâT";GR=*skuti-)
hãu = Abgrund, Schlund(DEX=un.etym; GR=*(s)keu-)
heaTã =Gerte (DEX= n.e.; GR=*spi-t-ia:)
herete =Sperber(DEX= n.e.; GR=*speredis)
hinag =Dornenstrauch=(DEX= n.e.; GR=*spin+ag)
horoiu =Specht(DEX= n.e.; GR=*sker+oi)
hot =Stück(DEX=n.e.; GR=*skuto)
hoT =Dieb(DEX=un.etym; GR=*skut-ios)
hudã =Loch(DEX=like Sl. "hadU"; GR=*skudh(r)a)
hudã =Haus(DEX knows "hudubaie" just= un.etym;GR=*skudha)
Alex