Re: [tied] Re: Caland [was -m (-n)?]

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:59:41 +0000, Glen Gordon <glengordon01@...>
wrote:

>
>Me, on the early Late IE schwa:
>>The *e/*o alternation is, as I already mentioned, the product of a
>>single vowel in early Late IE, *@ (schwa), becoming long before voiced
>>segments. The lengthened schwa ultimately became *o.
>
>Miguel:
>>Why is this influence of voiced segments only seen in the thematic vowel?
>
>The "thematic vowel" is the early Late IE schwa.

So the phoneme schwa _only_ occurred as the thematic vowel?


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...