Re: [tied] Re: 'Dog' revisited

From: Glen Gordon
Message: 27810
Date: 2003-11-29

Piotr:
>Let's note, however, that Lindeman variants normally show unshifted stress,
>and that they are very rare when R = *w.

Yes, and this is what I was contemplating a solution for, but
Miguel was too busy trying to mock what I was saying to
listen to the message I was expressing. Rrrr >:(


>Apart from *k^uwo:n and *duwo:, the only clear example
>I can only think of is the Sanskrit treatment of pronominal forms
>(<tva:M> ~ <tuva:M>).

Yes, well I see a pattern then but I don't know what to
make of it. We should rule out *sxwel-, *dHwor- and *gHwer-
from the pattern. The pattern would consist of *dwo:/*'duwo:,
*twe/*'tuwe and *kwo:n/*'kuwo:n which would show this
stress shift. That pattern would affect nonenclitics beginning
with Cw- where C is any stop which isn't voiced-aspirated.

Could that work? Are there counterexamples?


= gLeN

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/features&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca