[tied] Re: septm [was: Caland [was -m (-n)?]]

From: elmeras2000
Message: 27802
Date: 2003-11-28

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:25:39 +0100 (MET), Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen
> >How did either of you decide this matter?
>
> 1) Omotic languages are generally tonal.
> 2) Most numbers have no diacritics on them, some have two accent
marks in
> the same word, suggesting a tonal system with the default (low)
tone
> unmarked.

Very good. I accept that.

Jens