From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 27650
Date: 2003-11-26
> You're probably right. So, the proper theory is then, that as thecommunity
> domesticated dog passed out of SE Asia from one linguistic
> to the next, the languages of those communities did not borrowwords
> similar to *kwon along with the dog, but decided independently touse
> words similar to *kwon for that particular trade article,presumably
> for onomatopoeic reasons, since dogs go "kwon, kwon" in erh, someIt's a shame English dogs go, 'Woof woof', not 'Whoof, whoof.'
> language?