From: Peter P
Message: 27246
Date: 2003-11-15
> Peter P wrote:in
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" <alxmoeller@...> wrote:
> >
> >> More, maybe should be interesting to see that "trei" was in Greek
> > too
> >> "trei" and there is no "i" in Lat. "tres". The apparition of "i"
> > doiby "trei"
> >> and "trei" is due analogy to each other ("doi" influenced
> > andIn the masculine and feminine forms
> >> "trei" influenced by "doi"), etc.
> >
> >> Alex
> >
> > Latin tria - three. No /i/??
> >
> > Peter P
> >
>
> and where is "e"?:-)))
>
> from that form "tria" you wont get the "trei" in Rom.feminine is
> Since you mentionated it, in Rom. for saying "the tirth" in
> "a treia"; be sure there is no Latin continuation there sincethe /i/
> never gets an /ei/ in Rom. It is a simply feminine "-a" suffixationof
> "trei"In the case of 'third' I wonder if Latin 'tertia' has anything to do
>
> Alex