From: tgpedersen
Message: 27113
Date: 2003-11-13
>of
> I feel that these Semitic loans were adopted earlier than the event
> syncope in Mid IE (c.5000 BCE). So *sweks and *septm in Mid IEwould have
> been initially loaned as *swekse and *septem. Only the vowels *e(schwa)
> and *a (low central) were available to IE speakers at the timewhich is why
> the vowels don't appear to be quite in line with the Semitic roots.But this
> latter paragraph is my own idea so feel free to reject it.suffixes that
>
> While the numeral "seven" in IE contains fossilized Semitic
> show that it was the masculine form, the numeral "six" would seem todon't
> correlate with the _feminine_ form. (PS: For those who forgot or
> know, *-t- is normally a feminine suffix in Semitic but innumerals, it is
> the reverse and is used to mark the _masculine_ form. This isbecause
> the seemingly feminine numeral goes with the masculine noun andseen
> vice versa -- a kind of gender-pairing agreement.) Now is this all
> coincidence
> or could there be something more to this Semitic gender opposition
> in feminine *sweks versus masculine *septm?it a
>
> Piotr calls *septm a "cultural" loan. Personally, I'd rather call
> "religious"spreading
> loan. I feel that the whole reason why "seven" was such a widespread
> loan from Semitic was because Middle-Eastern worldviews were
> into Europe along with the people during the neolithic. I suspectit relates
> to a common goddess mentioned by Gimbutas that was widely worshippedprinciple"
> during this time. While Gimbutas makes it out as some kind of earth,
> fertility or nature goddess, why don't we just call it a "female
> thing in order to establish the following idea. Think of this allas the
> "SevenI'm always happy when people accept my ideas. Let me remind people
> Sisters of Pleiades" idea.
>insane,
> Now if we were to connect all this with the idea of a "masculine"
> and "feminine", we might be on to something (or be completely
> one or the other).(ultimate from Austronesian)
>
> So here's a new and improved thought I haven't put out yet. What
> if, not only are the words *sweks and *septm religious loans adopted
> from a Semitic(-like) language during the Neolthic,
>but that the twometaphorical
> words were borrowed together in opposite genders, representing
> a Yin-Yang duality that related somehow to a worldview at the
> time. One might think of the universe as a pair of masculine and
> feminine entities that come together, and it is their union that
> causes "creation", both in a sexual sense and in a grander,
> one. We see this around the Mediterranean (eg: Egyptian Shu and Geblooked
> who "come together" each day and give birth to Ra, the sun). We
> might call attention to certain artifacts which actually combine
> sexual characteristics of both sexes together to form an icon. I
> recall seeing a picture in one of Gimbutas' books showing what
> like a strange cross between a bird and a phallus. One couldinterpret
> this according to this Yin-Yang concept, whereby the bird isfeminine
> while the phallus is naturally male.Witness,
>
> Actually, on a little side-thought, because I grew up Jehovah's
> I grew up with some really kooky ideas that I've now mostlyrejected.
> However, I do recall mention of "six" being related to imperfection,opposition
> the devil, etc while "seven" being considered perfect, or divine. We
> can see the completion of world in _seven_ days, for example, while
> the number of the beast is "666". It's interesting that this
> exists here and it's along the same lines. Instead of "six"representing
> a female principle, it has become villainized as demonic orimperfect
> while "seven", instead of representing the masculine principle, hasthe "masculine"
> become divine.
>
> Thus, I'd dare say now that *sweks was somehow once related to
> the feminine principle, while *septm was intrinsic to
> principle. Yin and Yang. El and Baal. Yahweh and Satan. The totalityOne star of the Pleiades is imperfect, since it blew up some thousand
> of the universe described with two numerals.
>
> Just an empty thought.