From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 27094
Date: 2003-11-12
> Abdullah Konushevci wrote:compared it
> >> amalusta considered to have been meant "camomile"; Jokle
> >> with Alb. word "ambëlë" which means "sweet". Why should be atoday.
> > camomile
> >> sweet, that was unexplained, but the connection is made even
> >> The taste of camomile is far away from being sweet, but isbitter.
> >> The PIE *omlos . If it meant "bitter" and Dacian word was indeedsuffix
> > from
> >> this , then the unsuffixed form should be maybe *amalu(s) +
> >> *(s)ta ?*am-
> >> Interesting, Latin "amarus" (bitter) is seen as deriving from
> > ro- asname of
> >> reduced form of *omo-; the Indic forms present both liquids "l"
> > and "r"
> >> in the reflexes of the PIE root.
> >>
> >> Alex
> > ************
> > Why should, for heaven's sake, PIE *omlos be *amalu(s)-?
> >
> > Konushevci
>
> Just a simple wild speculation with not very much base. If the word
> meant "camomile" as PA mentionated it I thought to corelate the
> the plant with the taste of bitter as it tastes.it
> On this basis, thinking at the PIE *omlos which meant bitter, then
> should be probable that PIE *omlos > Dacian amalus.and
>
> About initial "o" I cannot say anything since the names of rivers
> some names and toponymes presents an initial "o". If this is from anthem:
> short or long "o" that is not sure at all. I will present some of
>(attested
> Rivers:Ordessos, Oskios
> Toponyms:Outidava, Ofiousa, Odessos, Orgame (Orgalema), Ozubia,
> Olodoris, Ourbriana, Odriozo
> Name of the tribes: Oboulensioi, Oitensioi,
> Names: Dacian name Oroles, Thracian name Oloros; Oikorsis
> in Moesia Inferior)that
>
> In the Illirian regions we have too something:
> Orgame, Orgesos, Orgomenai, Ozobia, Ozuaei
> For "Oescus" from Moesia Superior, Pogirc shows as cognate Illyrian
> "Uscana";
> In fact he see more equivalents between Dacian & Ilirian rivers and
> toponyms as between Daciaan and the Thracian; some other conclude
> the classic Thracian Theritory, south of Balkan mountains, shouldhave
> been "new" Thracian, due migrations from Dacian space.to
> If this should be true, then the old idea with Migration from South
> North, seems a bit strange since one will expect to have more************
> Thracian-Dacian toponyms as Ilirian-Dacian.
>
> Alex