From: alex
Message: 26888
Date: 2003-11-04
> 04-11-03 19:22, alex wrote:If we accept that "s" in "sorë" ios because of a "ke, ki" then one
>
>> Thus Albanian "besë" appears to derive from *pak^-
>> The satem aspect is hard to show here since the last wovel could have
>> been an "e" which will point out to an ordinary palatalisation.
>
> No, it doesn't appear to derive from *pak^-. There's no "ordinary
> palatalisaton" of *k^ in Albanian. *k^ + front vowel (why *e??) would
> still have given <th>.
>
> Piotr
>