Re: [tied] Slavic v. Slavonic (was: Romanian Loans in OCS?)

From: alex
Message: 26362
Date: 2003-10-11

Richard Wordingham wrote:
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "m_iacomi" <m_iacomi@...> wrote:
>
>> Try to use words carefully. Slavic (not Slavonic!) had an
> important
>> influence
>
> What's the difference between Slavic and Slavonic?
>
> Richard.

Slavonic is the la later language in which have been redacted the
canonical texts of Old Slavic.
In fact there is something a bit curios here. The denominations
"paleoslavic", "Old Slavic", "Old Church Slavic" are meant for a
Bulgarian dialect from teh region of Thesalloniky, a dialect dead today
since the actual Bulgar Language is based on another Bulgarian dialect.

Where my problem is with this Old Slavic versus Slavonic is here:
-are there texts in Old Slavic or all the texts one has are these in
Slavonic which are newer and in another dialect as Old Slavic? I suppose
there must be texts in this Bulgarian Dialect because otherways one
could not see that the later texts are written in another dialect.

Alex