From: ikpeylough
Message: 26305
Date: 2003-10-09
> Eh eh, this is a circular definition: Latino is everyone whoNot if they aren't L1 Spanish speakers.
> consider themselves as Latino. Would it include Brazilians? The
> definition states that is aplicable to Spanish-language countries,
> which would automatically exclude Brazilians, but if a Brazilian
> consider himself as a Latino it will be a Latino. By this circular
> definition , if Swedes identify themselves as Latinos, they will
> be Latinos. Amazing.
> Joao SL
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brian M. Scott
> To: Patrick C. Ryan
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:01 AM
> Subject: Re[2]: [tied] Glen, regarding...
>
>
> At 10:09:23 PM on Wednesday, October 8, 2003, Patrick C.
> Ryan wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Miguel Carrasquer" <mcv@...>
>
> >> Define "Latino".
>
> > <PCR> In the politically correct USA, Latino is the
> > favored term to designate Mexican Amerindians, who speak
> > Spanish (even as a second language).
>
> > It is sometimes extended to Amerindians from other
> > countries who speak Spanish.
>
> This is wildly inaccurate. Here's what the U.S. Census
> Bureau says:
>
> Hispanics or Latinos are those people who classified
> themselves in one of the specific Spanish, Hispanic, or
> Latino categories listed on the Census 2000 questionnaire
> -"Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano," "Puerto Rican", or
> "Cuban" -as well as those who indicate that they are
> "other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino." Persons who indicated
> that they are "other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino" include
> those whose origins are from Spain, the Spanish-speaking
> countries of Central or South America, the Dominican
> Republic or people identifying themselves generally as
> Spanish, Spanish-American, Hispanic, Hispano, Latino, and
> so on.
>
> Everyday usage varies but certainly does not restrict the
> term to Mexican Americans; the traditional term for them is
> <Chicano, -a>.
>
> Brian