Re: [tied] Timing of ablaut

>Brugmann's Law *is* correct, but I think you are making it correct
>ad absurdum. .... if
>the way the law was first formulated is defended at all costs as the
>way it should be worded even in the present state of our knowledge,

No. Again you are pretending I said something I did not say. "defended at
all costs" is your language, not mine.

Peter