From: Michael J Smith
Message: 26123
Date: 2003-09-28
> Michael:________________________________________________________________
> >Proposing what particular race Indo-Europeans were may be
> >unrealistic but is not racist in any way, and nowhere did he
> >say he believed one race was superior to another.
>
> Um, really, this IS a linguistic forum. Race is so secondary to
> Indo-European linguistics. And unfortunately, since there are
> still nuts out there that still follow H*tler's propoganda in
> relation to Indo-European, when I hear someone obsessing
> over the fantasy that Indo-Europeans were blond and blue
> eyed raises giant alarm bells in my head.
>
> I mean really, what is so special about blondness to this Siglo
> character as opposed to redhair or even dirty blond? How is
> a garden-variety recessive gene important here at all???
> This isn't gLeN being grumpy, it's about maintaining some
> common sense. Siglo has no real point and wants to insist
> on some strange ideology. If he wants to persist with it,
> he may by all means. But the last thing I want to see in my
> mailbox is a bunch of posts about some unattested and
> unlinguistic idea. I didn't sign up for that.
>
>
> = gLeN
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>