From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 25103
Date: 2003-08-16
>--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:No. I completely forgot.
>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 21:09:15 +0100, Piotr Gasiorowski
>> <piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:
>> The variation *n ~ *r ~ *w is fully explained by
>> the soundlaws I have proposed [*]. Secondary regularisation to fit
>> the regular u-stem pattern is unsurprising.
><Snip>
>> [*] I'll see if I can convert my suite of (f)lex rules to Mark's
>> "sounds" program.
>
>Did you ever get round to coding them up?