Re: [tied] Moses of Khoren's "Geography"

george knysh wrote:

>
> *****GK: The hypothesis of a "missing" part is
> gratuitous. "Not written for certain reasons" is much
> better. The Bulgaria of Tsar Peter was no threat to
> Constantinople, and its "management" a relatively easy
> affair. I'm sure there were reports etc. about it in
> the imperial archives, but hardly much incentive to
> work these up into a special chapter of DAI. As to the
> Vlachs, again, there was no particular need to mention
> those within the boundaries of the Empire.Had they
> been a significant presence north of the Danube they
> would doubtless have received a notice.*****
>

There is a problem. Why should became a "need" to mention them in the IX
century then _within_ the boundaries of the empire?

Alex