From: tgpedersen
Message: 24541
Date: 2003-07-15
> > > *ghordh- > *horb- > urb-fornax, both
> > That latter half looks odd. Why not hortus > **urtus then?
>
> See my previous posting. There is no logic. Why furnus but
> from the same root? There is a suggestion that *or > ur was a non-urban
> dialect. On the other hand, urbs may be from a different rootentirely
> (*wrdhi- [Meiser] - perhaps *wer-2 Pokorny 1151 +-dh-i-)which would then coexist with the roots *gh^erdh- and *gh^erd-
>