From: tgpedersen
Message: 24511
Date: 2003-07-14
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 10:08:27 +0000, tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...>Of course. Sorry.
> wrote:
>
> >*g^hordh- > urb-? Why the loss of g^h- (instead of > f-)?
>
> *g(^)h- > h- in Latin.
>That latter half looks odd. Why not hortus > **urtus then?
> >What are the intermediate steps (if any)?
>
> *ghordh- > *horb- > urb-
>