Re: [tied] Establishing a year for Mahabharata war: 3067 BCE

From: S.Kalyanaraman
Message: 24428
Date: 2003-07-12

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Glen Gordon" <glengordon01@...>
wrote:> And while you're at it, Kal, you may provide archeological
evidence> to support your claim, rather than saying that there is no
evidence> to refute the claim. The latter ploy is an ages-old
stalling tactic> to avoid the cold smack of Logic up the upside.
>
> A lack of contradictory evidence is never "evidence" on planet
Earth.

Thanks, gleN.

I will certainly cover the archaeological evidence too, without
stalling. River Sarasvati is a great help with about 2000
archaeological sites. In addition to the texts I cited earlier (in a
URL), I would also like to add that there is still a problem to be
resolved between 3067 BCE and 3102 BCE. The latter date is the
tradition in India for the start of the Kali Yuga. These dates also
have to be rconciled without ignoring them as contradictory evidence.