Re: [tied] az+

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Sergejus Tarasovas"
<S.Tarasovas@...> wrote:

>> According to the
>> latest A. Rosinas' monograph on the history of Baltic pronouns,

the

>> aggregate evidence of all the available Baltic material (including
>> archaic texts and dialects) points to Proto-Baltic *ez'
>> (rather than
>> *é:z').
>>
>> Proto-East-Baltic, that is, eh?

>I'll re-check in [the] evening, but if I remember correctly he

accounts for

>the Old Prussian evidence as well.

Both Rosinas (_Baltu, kalbu, i,vardz^iai_, p. 38) and Maz^iulis
(_Pru:su, kalbos etimologijos z^odynas_, I, p. 100) reconstruct Proto-
Baltic *ez' on the basis of both East Baltic and Old Prussian (<as>,
<es>) evidence. Rosinas reconstructs *es' for Proto-East-Baltic
(ibid., p. 34).

Sergei