Re: [tied] Re: cutulare

m_iacomi wrote:

> Of course not, they're just related through the original Latin
> "excutere" `to shake` gaving birth to two specialized VL words
> mentioned above. So?

there is no "so". As Piotr said he have the senasation of a deja view I
remembered why. The discusion was with Miguel where at time I wondered
that such "latin" compositum with *ex are to find in Rom. just in verbs
which begin with "exC" where we have a PIE root with "s" already, thus
there is no need to put any Latin help there. For the shake of
clearance, again _just the "Latin" root_ will be to find but nothing of
the derivatives. From all these derivatives you have nothing inherited:
decutare, excutare, incutare, percutare, repercutare, discutare,

>
> So, according to your infinite wisdom, the infinitive form cannot
> be related with the I-st person of the present tense?!

that was not the point

>
>> I don't guess one will can begin anything with a root in
>> latin as "quat-", maybe an "quatt-" n asymilation of "quatr-".
>
> That's pure nonsense.

see "quatto"=quadrassis

I hope we can close the thread now.