[tied] Re: Catunari

From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 23959
Date: 2003-06-27

Why should we accept anything so patently false? Where did you take
this
> idea from? In deverbal nouns (your first two examples) we have the
> Slavic instrumental suffix *-dlo- (< PIE *-dHlom), still preserved
as
> <-dlo> in West Slavic. Slavic also has *-lU (neuter *-lo), an
originally
> adjectival suffix. It occurs in past participles like *bylU (now
> functioning as preterites in the modern Slavic languages after the
loss
> of the copula), but it is not itself a truncated verb!!
>
> > I don't know why we must
> > deny that Alb. suffix - ishte is not from the same verb <ishte>
was!
>
> Because its history is easily traceable to Slavic *-is^c^e < *-
i:sk-jo-.
> Slavic has both *-is^c^e and the historically underlying suffix *-
isko.
> The South Slavic reflex of *-is^c^e is <-is^te>, and that's the
source
> of both Albanian <-ishte> and Romanian <-i$te>; the meaning of
both is
> the same as in Slavic; it would be just silly to deny the
connection.
>
> Piotr
************
As far as I remember, its Skok's idea and, until tomorrow, you must
wait, because I will cite exactly his masterpiece "Etimologijski
rjecnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika", JAZU, Zagreb, 1971(?).

Konushevci