Glen Gordon wrote:
>
> So if Alex can't accept that French, Spanish, Portuguese, Catalan,
> etc is the living modernday Latin, then there may be no hope for
> our poor misguided Romanian comrad.
>
>
> = gLeN
Glen, you are a analyst. I will put the problem very simple since i
speak just about Romanian here. If people see in Spanish and French and
Italian the "modern Latin" i have nothing against. I just say, Romanian
is related to them to an older layer as Latin. If you need some opinons
of known names, tell me and I give these opinons to you.
a) there is Latin
b) there is ProtoRomanian wherefrom derived DacoRomanian and Aromanian
From Latin as Muttersprache to Protoromanian should be some 200-300
years.
Aromanian separated by DacoRomanian . There are after some opinons 1500
years, after some opinons 1000 years as these two dialects separated.
I understand aromanian
An aromanian understand Dacoromanian.
The languages have the same structure, are in fact the same langauge
with their "regionalisms".
I don't understand Latin
An aromanian does not understand Latin.
As analyst, do you expect to see the same language which in 2-300 years
became ( supposed) an another language ( Latin > ProtoRomanian) for not
changing in the next 1000 or 1500 years ? The theory of probability says
" it could be possible" as a 6 in Lotto. The life shows a 6 in Lotto is
a dream. But in life we have seen some 6 in Lotto. Thus, I am searching.
alex