Re: [tied] Re: Historical implications__

g wrote:

>> *****GK: Good for you Alex (I think?(:=))) I was going
>> to ask similar questions a bit along the road, but you
>> beat me to it.
>
> Yeah but those forlorn "sheep" still translated
> those notions into a Romance idiom and not into
> Turkish, Slavic or Magyar. Even if their Romance language
> lost whole lotta Latin vocabulary, they synthesized
> pretty much new one based on remaining basic lexems
> of Latin extraction.

well, that is that. Basic lexems which can very well to belong to Good
know's to whom.

fecioara is a creation of Romanian, so it is said, that is not a Latin
thingie
lumea (world) < Latin "lumen"= light
împaratie= too creation of Romanian if we accept that "mparat" <
imperatore
Zeu is by no way from Deus but Thracian
Dumnezeu as Dominus is questionable since in the "barbarian" spells (
Cato, Incantamente Magica) we have:

"Huat, hauat, huat, ista pista sista, dannabo Damnaustra" (Variant 1)
"Huat, haut, haut, ista sistar sis ardannabon Dunnaustra(Dannaustra)
(Variant 2)

Alex