From: george knysh
Message: 23274
Date: 2003-06-14
> george knysh wrote:*****GK: I on the other hand, have no doubt whatever
> > --- alex <alxmoeller@...> wrote:
> > For my own
> >> curiosity , the big
> >> question remains why Prophyrogenetsu do not
> records
> >> the valahs within
> >> his empire.
> >
> > GK: DAI was written as a handbook for his son
> re
> > foreign policy. So there would not be that much
> > incentive to describe the internal situation in
> the
> > Empire except in so far as it might involve the
> prime
> > focus. I don't remember offhand if Porphyrogenitus
> > mentions ALL other components of the Empire except
> the
> > Vlachs. I don't think he does, but this can easily
> be
> > verified.Actually what is even more interesting is
> > that he does not mention the Vlachs as relevant
> for
> > Byzantine foreign policy. And indeed why should
> he?
> > There was no Vlach presence North of the Danube in
> his
> > time which needed to be taken into account.
> >
>
> Interesting coclusions are to find by you:-)
> Since the bulgars have been allways the goods
> friends of bvalahians,
> they should have been mentionated at South of Danube
> in the presence of
> bulgars if this is a matter of foreing policy since
> there has been
> indeed a danger, thus they should have been
> important to show.George,
> easy, easy I begin to doubt about you:-)