From: george knysh
Message: 23207
Date: 2003-06-14
> existence of the*****GK: Slavic Bulgarian Christianity did not "take
> transdanubian possesion of the Bulgarians, we agree
> there should have
> been a strongly slavic christianity.
> Pecenenegs and Magyar*****GK: We could look at this. Do you have the
> should have maybe cutted it but never changed it to
> what it is today. In
> fact all these do not fit because there are just
> erronate assumptions
> which cannot fit together.If one gives no penny on
> the epic story from
> Oguzname, one should wonder wbout the "unknown
> country called Balak
> which is situated north of the country of Bulgars".
> This description is
> the one given in Geographia of armenian Moses
> Chorenatsi and was written
> in the second half of the IX century. I won't speak
> here about "missing
> evidences" but I will speak here about "evidences
> which does not fit a
> certain assumption". To sume up about "missing
> evidences":
>
> - Geografia of Chorenatsi ( begining with 850)
> - Map of Klaproth ( map of year 912)*****GK: There's nothing to this.*****
> - Chronicle of Nestor*****GK: The Gesta reflect (at best) some notions
> - Gesta Hungarorum
> ��__________________________________
> I know you have your opinion about Chronicle of
> Nestor where you like to
> see a projection of events which happened in the
> time of Romans with the
> events wich occur with comming of Hungarians ( I
> wondered which is the
> role of the Slavs in that region in the time as the
> Romans conquered it)
> but the chronicle of Nestor is not standing alone
> there as you see.
>
> Alex
>
>