From: george knysh
Message: 23204
Date: 2003-06-14
> george knysh wrote:GK: I don't understand this comment Alex. Are you
>
> > The huge expansion of
> > Slavdom which began in the later 5th c. was due
> > neither to Goths nor to Huns. We talk about
> migration,
> > but perhaps the just mentioned "expansion" is a
> better
> > word, since Slavs continued to hold the areas
> whence
> > they "expanded".
>
> (Alex)Beside the Romania and Albania.
>in
> > Perhaps a similar scenario would work
> > for the Romanians, viz., expansion rather than
> > "migration" (except for those actually involved in
> the
> > move). BTW Mommsen has been quite superseded by a
> host
> > of 20th c. investigators.
>
> (Alex) it wont work because of the slavs. We expect
> North of Danube as the******GK: I think you have misunderstood me here. I am
> first valahian states have been created, the Slavic
> element. And not in
> the upper clas as knez and prister but in the lower
> class of simply
> peasants, being numerous enough for playing the same
> role as the
> valahians played in south of Danuber, in both
> countries Serbia and
> Bulgaria. Such mentions are not to find.