Re: [tied] Oguzname [Re: Klaproth]

--- altamix <alxmoeller@...> wrote:

> For me the strongest reason of Romanins being North
> of
> Danube is the Slavs. The events in the Slavic world
> begining with VII century until XIV century. To
> quote you
> George, if a folk was showed for a periode of time
> in a
> place and they simply dissapier, then something
> major
> happened( see the theritory of Wallachei and
> Moldawia
> which was known as "Slavic country" in certain
> period
> of time). The simply fact in in that geographical no
>
> slavic state arrised in that area shows there has
> been
> something which did not allowed something like this
> to
> happen. This "something" is subject of discussion,
> but it cannot be put out of the game.

*****GK: Something "major" certainly happened North of
the Danube: a strong stream of Romanian colonization
from South of the Danube (with noticeable results by
the 12th and 13th centuries), which eventually led to
the establishment of the Wallachian and Moldavian
states in the 14th c. The Slavs, however, did not
disappear overnight. Their continued existence in many
parts of these territories can be easily demonstrated
(and this is the major difference between them and the
Proto-Bulgars).******

Reading the book of Ptto J. Maenchen, I found an

> interesting
> name in the time of huns there "Dabragezas" and this
> word
> should be seen a word of Antes.

*****GK: This is one of the "Antic" names that
Struminski considered to be likely Gothic. I can
certainly see the argument for the second part
thereof, but the first sounded Slavic to me. Perhaps
Piotr might clarify.******

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com