Re: [tied] Ah, look at all the lonely languages

From: Gerry
Message: 22955
Date: 2003-06-10

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "anthonyappleyard" <MCLSSAA2@...>
wrote:
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Gerry" <waluk@...> wrote:
> > When has Latin ever had "native" speakers?
>
> For a while in the Roman Empire. But it depends on what you mean by
> Latin. Do you include regional dialects such as Praenestine and
> Faliscan? Do you include the bad and progressively worse colloquial
> Latin which has to be postulated as the immediate common ancestor
of
> the Romance languages? For example, it had an intruding German-type
> new perfect tense "habeo scriptum librum" (or rather, "abyo iscrito
> libro" or the like) which produced French "(j')ai e'crit (un)
livre".

Nope. Am not including any of the dialects. Only PURE Latin. Still
claim it occurred during the Roman Empire?

Gerry

Previous in thread: 22954
Next in thread: 22957
Previous message: 22954
Next message: 22956

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts