calling John Croft

From: Gerry
Message: 22828
Date: 2003-06-07

--- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "Geraldine Reinhardt" <waluk@...>
wrote:
Yes, I will be pleased to forward this to John Croft yet the only
places I'm able to reach him are at two egroups: cybalist &
nostratica (but I will do so).

Anyhow, your akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com doesn't provide any
informatin.

Croft is an excellent linguist. You haven't provided any of Dr.
Loga's archives.

Gerrry
----- Original Message -----
From: Bala Pillai
To: subas@... ; akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com ; "Geraldine
Reinhardt"
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: A New Look at Origins of Species


(Penang, Malaysia) Dr Loga,

Yet another audience that needs to be exposed to precise and
condensed enunciation of your vast Sumerian-Tamil proof organising
energies. In time.

(SF, Calif) Gerry: Can you forward this on to John Croft? I am
certain that he is not an expert in South Indian languages. Would
like to expose him to the vast proof of the nearly-all encompassing
parent-child relationship between Sumerian and Tamil. Have John skim
the archives of Dr Loga's postings at akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com -
- thanks Gerry.

cheers../bala
Bala Pillai, Sydney, Australia
Acumen Networks/Mind Ecosystems/Global Brain
http://www.ryze.com/go/bala

----- Original Message -----
From: Geraldine Reinhardt
To: bigbangtango@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: [bigbangtango] Re: A New Look at Origins of Species


The most recent post I received from a member of Nostratica (John
Croft) was that Sumerian was an isolate. If that were so, then no
one could claim ancestry to Sumer & the Sumerians. One wonders
therefore if Sumer (the city) might have been populated by non-
mortals?

According to Julian Jaynes, as recently as the late 2nd millennium
B.C., men had no consciousness and were automatically obeying the
voices of the gods.

Thusly, when did the brain show expansion? Could have been during
the time of "Neanderthal" when we have physical evidence of a body
and head that was "bulked up". As far as origins of sexuality, I
think Howard would claim that it began when the first cyanobacteria
tangoed with each other (likely 7 or so billion years ago).

I have more than 3 years of language origins posts in my group so
stop on by: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/language-origins
and take a look.

Gerry


----- Original Message -----
From: dil8net
To: bigbangtango@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: [bigbangtango] Re: A New Look at Origins of Species


I'm curious Gerry what findings would you be willing to share
with me
about your inquiries into language origin(s)?

I'm intrigued about the base language of the past from those of
maybe
the Sumerians, Accadians...since we learn language from out
parents,
and they learn from theirs, etc.

And requirements to learn language prior to having parents to
teach
would mean that the brain would have to develop in similar time
with
the vocals and ears.

These things also bring to mind the question of the origin of
sexuality. The power of reproduction and the timing...capable
persons arising to join and reproduce, the physical requirements
needed and the communication involved.

arr, how these things branch off so easily.




--- In bigbangtango@yahoogroups.com, "Geraldine Reinhardt"
<waluk@...> wrote:
> Michael, I've attached my enhanced blurb on the expansion of
my
web page.
>
> Any further commentary?
>
> Gerry
--- End forwarded message ---