On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:36:49 +0200, Miguel Carrasquer <
mcv@...> wrote:
>Covered extensively in my previous posting.
>
>1du: *-h2mW- > *-h2w-
>2du: *-h2t- (*-th2-)
>3du: *-h2-, *-h2t-
In the middle 2du., there was apparently some hesitation between the active
2nd. person suffix *-t- and the stative/middle 2nd.person suffix *-th2- (<
*-tk). The variants are therefore better given as:
2du.: *-h2t- ~ *-h2th2-
The stative as a whole can be reconstructed as:
*-k *-k-mu *-t-mu
*-tk *-k-t(k)u *-t-ku > *-d-GW
*-0 *-k- *-n,
giving perfect:
*-h2-a *-h2wé *-mW-é
*-th2-a *-h2t(h2)V' *-tW-é (< *-dhW + é)
*-0-e *-h2(t)é *-r
and middle:
*-h2- *-h2-w- *-mW-
*-th2- *-h2-t(h2)- *-dhW-
*-(t)- *-h2-(t)- *-n-(t)-/*-r-
=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...