[tied] English Phonemes (Was Re: [j] v. [i])

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Glen Gordon" <glengordon01@...>
wrote:

>
> David:
> >What about it Piotr? Can "yet", "it", "pie" and "me"
> >be analyzed as /jEt/, /?jt/, /paj/ and /mjj/?
>
> Yes it can! And thanks to the budding new-age study
> of "shadow consonants", everything can be linked to
> everything! All is One. Oooomm....
>
> - gLeN

wel, j&r bjjjng '& tart '&gejn, b&t djd jww
rjjljj k&nsjd&r hw&t 'aj hæd tww sej? 'jz
ðjs, 'or 'jz ðjs not, '& k&mpljjtljj fownjjm&k
(wel, majn&s stres, 'jntownejš&n, 'et set&r&)
repr&z&ntejš&n '&v norþ '&mer&k&n 'jngl&š?

David

P.S. the "&gejn" and "not" above are for the benefit
of Canadian speakers. I pronounce them [&gIn] and [nat].