[tied] Re: Nominative: A hybrid view

Don't let Glen get to you Jens. He's a bit of
big tart, and since everyone on the list knows
it, your honor is in no danger. He means no
harm, but he tends to think that if he can kill
the messenger of bad news (to his theories),
that he can kill the news. If someday in the
future he does clear up all the mysteries of
early P.I.E. and Nostratic, I wouldn't be
surprised if we find him thanking you for
your contributions to his final understanding.

David

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen <jer@...>
wrote:

> Dear David,
>
> can't you accept an unbiased and logically compelling argument when

you

> read one? The great master wrote this himself:
>
> >> It's such a tired idea and I get grumpy when I even hear the
> >> word "monovocalism" now. Rrrrrr >:)
> >> - gLeN
>
> I suppose we must both admit that we had not fully realized the

problem

> caused by the tiredness of the theory, nor considered the grumpy

mood the

> term used about it has now caused.
>
> Jens