Re: Re: Re: [tied] Rum. prefix în- [Re: Androphobia]

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

>>> "im Bsl. durchaus durch ne- verdrängt; über ksl. ne-jeN-vêrI
>>> ,ungläublig', ne-jeN-sytU ,unersattlich = Pelikan' s. Berneker 429"
>>
>> ksl. in Baltic when the Balts became very late chrsits =
>
> What are you babbling? ksl. is Kirchenslavisch. Not Baltic.

And this I am babling. How is to asume that in Balto-Slavic the "*n."
was replaced by OCS "ne-" ( why OCS "ne" when in fact it is PIE *ne-?)
when the Balts became very late christians? The question was related
more for the Baltic connection and not for the Slavic one.