Re: [tied] Pronoun

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

>> What do you have to look for here with the personal pronoun? We have
>> spoked about the demonstrative pronoun
>
> Same thing.

I will ask David how to get from illa an "u" or "o" ( not on the paper,
but for real:-))

>
>> and the "-ua" and "-ul" which are by no mean to get phoneticaly from
>> "ille" but from "ollu/ulla".
>
> Don't be ridiculous. The ending of the masc. article is -l, the -u is
> originally part of the noun.
>
> lupu(m) > lupu > lup
> lupu(m) illu(m) > lupu-lu > lupul > /lupu/
>
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...

ach was!
lupu +illu > lupillu > lupil but not lupul
lupu +ollu > lupollu > lupulu ( remember the texts from the VIII century
with "casa lupuli"

I guess your alone problem is that historicaly the facts do not fit;
phoneticaly they do.