From: tgpedersen
Message: 21564
Date: 2003-05-06
> The intention was to remove the necessity of *e:1 > *a: as a post-CommonGmc.
> (i.e. post-continuum) 'borrowing' between by then differentiateddialects
> (some having developed *a: < *e:1, others not), a notion which Ibelieve was
> entertained in the original posting. If I am mistaken, pleasecontinue to
> correct me. ;)Oh, and wouldn't I ;-) This is difficult with a sword of Damocles
>
> Dagfinn
>