Re: [tied] Re: Oltak

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 20861
Date: 2003-04-07

----- Original Message -----
From: "Abdullah Konushevci" <a_konushevci@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 12:21 AM
Subject: [tied] Re: Oltak


> Concerning the second word et-je, e could be derived from PIE
*ai, *oi, *o: or in an Umlaut context from a.

Dialectally (north Geg) also with <-d-> (<ede, edja>). According to Cimochowski, these forms are older while <ete/etje, etja> are analogical (after the variant <et> from *ed, with final devoicing). He derives the word from *h2aidHos 'fire, burning' (perhaps an original *-es- neuter like Gk. aitHos).

Incidentally, another possible source of Alb. e (via *a) is a syllabic nasal in an umlauting context, and still another is *eu. This embarras de richesses is what makes Albanian etymology so devilishly difficult (and fascinating -- just contemplate the way *wi-dk^m.tih1 changed into <-zet>).

Piotr