From: alex_lycos
Message: 20252
Date: 2003-03-24
----- Original Message -----
From: "alex_lycos" <altamix@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 9:54 PM
Subject: [tied] Decev
In all comment bellow it should be g'e > s/z like in "senos/zenos" or
g'e > d like in "dent".
I have no idea where I have my mind and why I wrote g'he > s/z adn g'he
> d instead of g'e > s/z or g'e > d.Decev speak here just about the PIE
*g' and not about g'h.
Sorry
> If one will be not afraid of a mistake one will laugh. It seems that
> here is a big contradiction in the rules of Decev
> Once we will have an PIE *g'en which is supposed to give "zeno/seno"
in
> Thracian. An another time we will have an PIE *g'en-to which is
supposed
> to give an "dent" in Thracian. I am afraid I am a bit lost here. I
guess
> it doesn't matter if with "to" or not with "to" at the end, the *g'he-
> should have the same treatment. But not once g'he > se/ze and once g'h
>
> de. But Decev means that the PIE *g'h > d shows the satem character of
a
> language. This was something unexpected to me thus I ask now here if a
> "d" from a PIE "g'h" is a satem feature or if it is known at all an
*g'h
> > d in any IE languages
>
> alex
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor ---------------------~-->
> Your own Online Store Selling our Overstock
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/rZll0B/4ftFAA/46VHAA/GP4qlB/TM
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------~
->
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> .