Re: [tied] Re: Dacian

----- Original Message -----
From: "george knysh" <gknysh@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Dacian

> *****GK: What you need to demonstrate is the
> preponderance of Geto-Thracian hydronyms and toponyms
> in Romania+Moldavia if you wish to argue continuity,
> You've never been able to do this.****

You said the magic word: Moldova It should be enough just only one, no
more:-)
BTW which Moldova you mean now? The part of Rom. which is called Moldova
or the part incorporated for a time by Russia in its URSS and now being
the Moldavian Republic?

> *****GK: You've been arguing your point for well over
> a year. I'm not sure how many (if any)of your examples
> have been accepted as correct. It seems to me that the
> overwhelming majority of your arguments have been
> thoroughly refuted.******
>
Yes you are right. I was arguing for an year and every time I found more
argument. The arguments have been refuted? Which one? So far I remember
there have been discussion just regarding the opinions of Rom. words
versus Latin words, but nothing regarding the arguments like
Preda/Predavenses, Timoc/Timacenses & co. As I spoke about these there
was always silence and nothing more, no discussion about.