Re: [tied] Re: alb. gji

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

>
>> Also in Latin we have to deal
>> with plain g, not aspirated one - gh. And I didn't know any case
>> where plain PIE *g or Latin g gives to Albanian also plain g
>
> I don't understand. Surely Latin g gives Alb g (mergere --> mërgoj,
> for instance)
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...

I assume this is the same word as in Romanian : Albanian mërgoj = Rom.
merge.
Even if the semantism in Rom. and Alb. is not quiet identical they are
more appropiate as the Latin smenatism.
If you indeed belive that latin "merge"= submerge under water gave Rom.
"merge"= to go and Alb. "merge"= to migrate, I advice you to think well
about a bird.
I am not joking. There is a bird and its name shows that the paper-thery
is wrong.

Alex