From: Etherman23
Message: 19304
Date: 2003-02-26
> While waiting for a more expert reply, here's my observation:The thing that I find interesting is that *bh- seems way too common.
> Pokorny does list 30 *b- out of 2222, but they seem an unusually
> weak group,with doubtful, poorly attested, and nursery onomatopoiea
> entries. Cal Watkins' list in the American Heritage Dictionary,
> which just includes roots that have derivatives in English, lists
> two -- *bak "staff" and *bel "strong" -- vs. 35 for *bh-.