From: andelkod
Message: 19290
Date: 2003-02-26
> In my opinion it is not a Rom. word but a wordthis is
> which entered the languages trough the rulers of that time. If
> an avarian word as suppodes by other scholars or a bulgarian word( from
> the turkish roots) I don't care too much:-)The term could be of avarian or iranian origin, I really don't know,
>
> The Banat is shared in parts . For one of them the Romanians sayregarding to
> "Banatul Sârbesc"= The Serbian Banate. If this expresion is
> the region inhabitet by serbians or the region ruled by serbians,or the
> region given to the serbians in the XIX century, I am not sure howto
> interpret this. There is tough no connection with bulgarians. Ifthere
> should be one, it should have been very long time in the past.The Banat of Temesvar was never administered by a Ban to my
>
>say
> Rosetti see it too as a loan from hungarian. In other ways we can
> the word "ban"= money= short form of "banalis"?money
> Ivanescu means that after the invasion of tartars, the hungarian
> dissapired and then begun to appear the money of the Bans fromCroatia
> and Slavonia (1270).This money should have been in use until 1365when
> the King Vlaicu Voda made his own coins, but they were calledtoo "ban".