Dear K,
On the GSI President, Dr. B.P.Radnakrishna, well,
A.B.Roy reviewed one of your favourite books, namely,
�Vedic Sarasvati: Evolutionary History of a Lost River
of North-western India� for �Current Science� (VOL.
78, NO. 3, 10 FEBRUARY 2000, 346 Vedic Sarasvati:
Evolutionary History of a Lost River of North-western
India, reviewed by A. B. Roy). How do I get a very
different impression of Dr. Radnakrishna�s temperament
than what you are offering here?
http://tejas.serc.iisc.ernet.in/~currsci/feb102000/BOOKREVIEWS.PDF
And if you are serious about studying the
Uralic/Finno-Ugric connections of Indo-European
dispersal, you should consult:
Carpelan, Christian, and Asko Parpola, 2001.
Emergence, contacts and dispersal of
Proto-Indo-European, Proto-Uralic and Proto-Aryan in
archaeological perspective. Pp. 55-150 in: Christian
Carpelan, Asko Parpola and Petteri Koskikallio (eds.),
Early contacts between Uralic and Indo-European:
Linguistic and archaeological considerations.
(M�moires de la Soci�t� Finno-Ougrienne, 242.)
Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.
Regards, Juha
--- "S.Kalyanaraman <
kalyan97@...>"
<
kalyan97@...> wrote:
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski
> <piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:> It isn't a review.
> Hancock is cited
> there as a source of scholarly ideas.
>
> It is a review. Please see pp. 367-369 of the
> Journal Geological
> Society of India, Vol. 60, Oct. 2002. It is Piotr's
> opinion that
> Hancock is cited as a source of scholarly ideas. Not
> BP
> Radhakrishna's. The editorial has distinct sections:
> book review,
> reference to new archaeological site in Gulf of
> Cambay and thoughts
> on further developing geoarchaeology in Bharat.
>
> BPR ain't no promoter. In my view, he is one of the
> acknowledged
> authorities in quatenary geology in the country.
> Surely, Piotr is
> entitled to his views.
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com