Re: Sarasvati

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:

>
> --- "Daniel J. Milton <dmilt1896@...>"
> <dmilt1896@...> wrote:
> > I started my day as usual by reading the
> > Washington Post. Besides
> > reports on the usual war threats, disasters,
> > scandals, high level
> > incompetence, etc., there was a story on the
> > Saraswati question. It's
> > available online at
> >
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10141-2003Feb14.html
> > Nothing new to us (unless anyone was naive enough
> > to think we were
> > discussing a linguistic-archaeological question with
> > no political
> > implications), but not a bad popular summary.
> > Dan Milton
>
> ******GK: And here's some Iranian competition for
> "superiority":
> http://www.int-pub-iran.com/ipis07.htm
> Groink...*****
>

I hope it contains interesting material in its chapter of the Danu on
their latter-day descendants. Otherwise it is of course irrelevant to
modern science.
Oink!

Torsten

BTW surprisingly modern though. 'Armani'??