From: alex_lycos
Message: 18785
Date: 2003-02-13
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 06:42:02 +0100, "alex_lycos" <altamix@...>Right . An "i:" should have remained an "i" like........... in li:gnum >
> wrote:
>
>> Sure is mine. There is no reason to do not see the words vita, vitel,
>> vitsea as not related to each other. But romanian "vita" has no
>> cognate in latin.(still,but I guess there is one)
>> Latin "vita" should have given in PRB vEta
>
> No. It's vi:ta > vita
>
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...
>